Racism - Part II - Follow the money

I am going to start off this post with apologizing for an error I have made on my last post. I have mentioned that racism (as in the discrimination of races as we know it today) didn't exist until the 19th century. Looking back at my notes I found that it is actually dates back to the 18th century.

However, why and how did we develop the new form of discrimination based off of color of skin? Or, an even better question, who developed racism as we know it today?

So I began to research commonalities between the sudden increase in discrimination for humans that weren't white and other historical events during the 17th and 19th century. Through the 17th and 19th century the merchants of the Atlantic slave trade relied heavily on credit from the several banks in England and Spain. During the American Revolution the banks were aware of the the new nation's intentions of becoming a country of free men. The banks needed a way to insure the trade of slaves in the Americas. Using Americans that also had interests in the cheap labor to maximize the profit margin of cotton and other valuable trades began to devide people by race as justification to discriminate against Africans. CLR James writes in his Modern Politics:

“the conception of dividing people by race begins with its slave trade. Thus this [the slave trade] was so shocking, so opposed to all the conceptions of society which religious and philosophers had . . .the only justifications by which humanity could face it was to divide people into races and decide that Africans were an inferior race"

Mayer Amschel Rothschild sent his son Nathan Mayer Rothschild to Manchester to establish a bank in Great Britain. Nathan further exploited the slave trade by lending gold to a slave merchant then holding his slaves as collateral until repayment with credit. 

Before the Civil War, James Rothschild and the British Monarchy was so fearful of losing the slave trade which was their largest amount of income, they created and funded Knights of the Golden Circle to organize a coup before Abraham Lincoln could be inaugurated. When the KGC could no carry out the plans they became the main instigators for the southern states to vote for secession from the Union and thus leading into Civil War. In an issue of Executive Intelligence Review, a publication by Lyndon H. LaRouche. Jr. himself worte:

"The political evolution of the Knights of the Ku Klux 

Klan was a direct outcome of policies initiated during 

the first half of the 19th century by the British 

aristocracy and their "court Jews, the Rothschilds.

The starting point for unraveling this vast 

conspiratorial apparatus is the Knights of the Golden 

Circle."

"The next phase of the KGC's activity was to organize 

a military coup in the U. S. before Lincoln could be 

inaugurated. The KGC was used primarily as the 

main terror force to ensure that the key Southern 

states voted for secession. Its stated organizational 

purpose indicates the extent of its intentions at the 

time of the 1860 election of Lincoln"

Today the same type of tyrants, the bankers, the Rothschilds, the Morgans, the big Wall Street bankers are using racism today to enslave all of us. To justify continuous violations of our Constitutional Rights, to create chaos, blind us of what is really happening, to convince you of the lie that we need something better than the Constitution, their replacement, their government, not the government of the people.

Oath Keepers Org Are Liars

After the attack by the idiots on twitter who claimed to be oath keepers after I had defended Islam practicing Americans, I decided to report them to the Organization. To my surprise I got a response pretty immediate but it was to ask more questions of the incident. I answered all the questions and told them that I would like a formal apology and training to those members. Two weeks later haven't gotten any feedback.

So far my encounter with the Oath Keepers hasn't been a good one. I went to branch meeting here in San Diego that wasn't really impressive, it felt like a GOP rally and very not tasteful conversations, talking about Michelle Obama being a transvestite and so on. Then the twitter thing, and what I have seen on YouTube, it really doesn't seem like they aren't what they say they are. They are full of members that have hate for anyone that is not a Protestant Christian, hate for Hispanic-Americans or Latino-Americans. They hate everyone that is not a Republican, and they believe that the Constitutional Bill of Rights only belongs to a select number of Americans. Does this sound like someone that can uphold their oath.

Being an oath keeper to me means being faithful to the oath you made to support, defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution was meant for the ALL citizens of the United States of America. No matter color of your skin, religion you practice, who you sleep with in your bedroom (as long as it is consensual) or your your preferred political party.  Anyone that doesn't want to protect the Constitutional Rights for ALL AMERICANS is not an oath keeper in my book.

This is why I feel that Inception of Defending Freedom is the only one true Organization that can and will defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign or domestic. That includes anyone from the so called Oath Keepers Organization.

What I would like from the Oath Keepers Org is very simple, a formal apology, and show me that they are training all members that the Constitution applies to all Americans and that they will defend, support and uphold it for all Americans.

Strategy (Part I)

Today I wanted to write about what I believe the threat is against the Constitution of the United States, and what is Inception of Defending Freedom's strategy to preserve it. Lets begin with the enemy.

Most Americans have been blinded by a smoke screen of false politics and the capital's drama. Most of us are too hung up on conservatism vs. liberalism, terrorism and illegal immigration. This is all just a decoy to distract you from the real threat. Let me introduce you to your King, Dictator, Emperor or Tyrant.

OK, so its not the dollar itself. Do anyone know who controls the Federal Reserve? It is not our government, I can tell you this much. As a matter in fact, not many in the government knows who runs the Federal Reserve. When you visit the federal reserve official website you are able to see the structure of how the Federal Reserve is ran. It makes it seem that is run by appointed board members appointed by the President every 14 years. When you dig further you find out that there is a lot more to it. There are 12 district banks through out the nation that monitors and mints the nation's money. When I went to each individual bank's website, you can immediate see the run independent from each other, each running its own projects and businesses. 

The Federal Reserve in itself claims to not be a private identity, the following is mentioned in its official website.

Do you see the play of words. "Authorized by Congress", "appointed by the President", and then the wamie "President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branches of government do not have to approve any decisions made by the Federal Reserve". So tell me who makes the decisions, the board, the presidents of the individual banks, who makes executive decisions of what happens to our nation's money. Who is actually running our central bank? The billion dollar question. So check it out. The last paragraph in the screenshot above, it mentions "certain amount of stock is, by law, a condition of membership in the System". What does that mean?

Each Federal Reserve Bank is assigned a district, the private banks within those districts buy stock from the Federal Reserve Bank receiving a guaranteed 6% dividend. Now the Federal Reserve System makes it seem like in the surface as if this is the only benefit for the stock holding banks, but when you read the Federal Reserve Act you quickly find out that is not the case. According to the FR Act Section 4 explains who the board of directors are of each Federal Reserve Bank, 3 to 6 directors are represented by the stock-holding banks. Ding Ding Ding, so who runs the Federal Reserve Banks? 

Who else would have the most interest and how tax payers money is used, monitored distributed. So that is the Federal Reserve for you. There is so much more other than the Federal Reserve all though I feel the biggest enemies hide in this portion of the system. You still have the lobbyist, the bank and corporation owners we elect into government, the foreign central banks that buy stock into the ours, etc. These are the people that have the biggest interest in how our government is ran and they don't give to shits about the Constitution and our rights. Not to mention that the a central bank is unconstitutional.

I can go on and on how wars are fought in the interest of these puppet masters, and believe it or not they have a puppet master of their own. Every legislative decision is based off of what these tyrants need, how they are going to make their money, how they are going to profit. Everything from veteran's care to the control of the press. Do the research and you can see that there is only a couple of hand-full of people that are running all of it, and it is not by the people or for the people.

Now you know who your masters are, lets discuss our strategy to defeat and regain our Constitutional Rights. Stay tune for Part II. 

LMAO

I went to go check my mail this morning at the post office and it was close. Now, the last time I checked today is Veteran's Day. Unless I missed something on my federal calendar I didn't see where it mentioned Postal Service Day.



As usual, these things got me thinking. Of course I realize that it is a federal holiday and that there are veterans working in places like the Postal Service. Now I still believe that those that aren't veterans in federal agencies should still go to work, that is a personal opinion of mine. Anyways, here is where I get thinking. The government saves money some money when there is a holiday, right? You would think that when there is nothing going on during that day that the government would save money in not spending energy during that day or not using supplies that day. The answer is no, they still spend the same.

So let me recap this. We allow everyone in the federal government to take a day off regardless if they are veterans or not. No money is saved, no money goes towards veterans in need and everyone sits at home watching football and drinking beer. Sounds great to me (if I were talking to you, you would hear sarcasm in my voice).

I am not sure what is the purpose of having the post office close during Veteran's day. All I know is that while everyone enjoys a holiday that is meant for those that have made significant sacrifices to protect a piece of document, barbecuing, drinking, and making bunch of dough from sales, we have over 50,000 veterans homeless and unemployed, sick and in need of medical attention. Don't you just love the American dream.

Thugish

I know I said I would write a blog based off of my last post but I didn't get the participation I anticipated. Thank you so much for my good pals that did participate, thank you so much, I am always happy that I have your support.

Today's blog is on a realization that I have made today as I was waiting in line at the mess decks, or as my brothers and sisters from other branches call it "chow hall". This new generation have been surrendered. They have been surrendered to MTV, BET, VH1, TruTV, Son's of Anarchy and Walking Dead. The previous outlets mentioned are the nannies of the enemy.

As I waited in line for chow a few of my little brothers in arms decided that it would be ok to just cut in line. When I asked why, they were surprised that I asked, like I was from another planet. They just couldn't understand how I didn't understand why it is ok for them to cut. So I told them, "look, I am just going to go ahead and cut back in front of you and if the people behind me want to keep their mouth shut they can, I am not waiting behind you when I was here first". Once I sat down to enjoy the Navy's world famous lasagna, I over heard some of my little brothers talking, and they were talking like what people from my generation and prior would call "common thugs". They were having a legitimate conversation, don't get me wrong, but the manner was thugish. I just couldn't process.

It is no wonder how it is easy to get this new bread of service men and women to pretty much do anything you order them to do even if it is illegal, all you have to do is publicize it in that manner and they will follow.

BUT WAIT!!!!

I have a solution. Mentorship, and I can prove to you it works, I have a handful of service men and women that I have mentored and I can tell  you they are the top professionals you can expect to support and defend the Constitution, one of them has been such a great apprentice that I am proud to say he has surpassed me in rank, and I am ok with that because I know he will lead in the manner I trained him.

If I can get IDF off the ground I can hook up many of these miss guided sailors, marines, airmen and soldiers to a true Oath Keeper, and together we can get our defenses back for our Constitution. I hope you join me.

Interactive

Today's post is going to be a bit different and I hope to get your participation. I want to pose the question and you choose which answer best fits you.

Are the military air strikes in Syria and Iraq lawful?

a. Yes, the Commander-in-Chief has the power to order an attack at any time any where

b. No, but since its to fight terrorism it is ok

c. Yes, because it is sanctioned by the UN

d. No, per the Constitution only Congress of the United States can "... declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;"

Go ahead and answer in the comment area below, after I tally up the answers tomorrow I will base my next post base off the results.

J Steven Davis

As promised, I wanted to to share with you the remarkable story of Steve Davis and what journey. As I had mentioned, I met Steve at an Oath Keepers meeting in San Diego where he was a guest speaker. Steve has lived a very interesting life. Escaping death in multiple occasions, nothing prepared him for the government he served under to turn on him.

Let me begin with bringing to light Steve's amazing career, from beginning to present.

• U.S. Air Force as an Aircraft Records Tech, Legal USAF/CAP Service Specialist, Claims Investigator, Staff Judge Advocate, JAG, Aviation SAR/CN, Command Pilot

• La Verne Police Dept. Police Officer, Use of Force Instructor

• Parker Hannifin Corporation as Deputy Director of Contracts and Contract Administrator

• James S. Davis and Associates as Civil Trial Attorney and Corporate Counsel

• California Private Attorney General Group, APC as a Chief Counsel and Class Action Plaintiff Attorney Wage and Overtime Cases

• Central Intelligence Agency Contracted Field Agent - Classified

• San Bernardino Sheriff Dept. as Specialized Detectives Bomb-Arson; Major Fraud Investigations; Aviation SAR/CN, LEO Transport

• Arroyo Grande Fire Department Administrative Battalion Chief; Fire Investigation Unit; California Cert. Peace Officer

• Barstow Fire Protection Administrative District (Retired) as Deputy Chief, Assistant Fire Marshal, and California Cert. Peace Officer

• Litigation Logistics Group, Inc as Chief Operations Officer, Expert Witness and Legal Researcher

So as you can see, Steve lives to serve the people and uphold the Constitution. So why did the US Government go after Steve? Here is his story as told by him.

"I am a Certified Class Action Plaintiff Wage Attorney. I have sued and won over ten multi-million dollar cases against such companies such as TJ Maxx, Ross Dress for Less, Ritz Camera and others. After a television interview I did I was contacted by the United States Postal Inspector who asked me to investigate the U.S. Postal Service for not paying overtime.

I determined that he had a case so I filed a Class Action Case for the Postal Inspectors. The Defense Counsel was the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles. No sooner had I filed that case then the same office charged me with Tax Evasion and illegal carrying a duty weapon. They cannot not do both because of the Conflict of Interest, that is prosecuting opposing Counsel. The Federal Public Defender did not conduct a defense and although I later proved I was innocent, I am still fighting that case. The Government refuses to give me the proof they control on my actual innocence. So I remain a "convicted felon" and lost 5 years of my life as a "guest" of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. My new Attorney has tried to discuss this Brady v. Maryland violation with the U.S. Attorney but they refuse to discuss it. My cases in the Central District of California are 04-CR-0770 and 04-CR-0771. The Assistant U.S. Attorney on the case is Ruth Pinkel."

Steve told me his story after I went to him for research on the claims of the Government's Income Tax being unconstitutional, of which was for my post "Constitution (Part 2)"

I can't stress my brothers and sister in arms enough that we sworn an oath to defend and support the Constitution. What will it take? What would we do if our own government attacked the Constitution? These are questions that are important now. This is what we need to prepare for.

Comical

I had an interesting exchange of comments on a Google+ post which I found completely pointless. The post was on the US Military Community which is owned by Tony S.O. (A.K.A. Sargent Tony Hardass?) and the post was from him. Here is a screenshot

 So he claims that under President Obama there hasn't been a Surgeon General. Misleading the members of the community in order to discredit President Obama. Now keep in mind, I don't give two shits about President Obama, he is my Commander-in-Chief. But how many times have I mentioned my loyalty is not to him but to the Constitution of the United States?

I was compelled to correct the discrepancy because I felt that this post was misleading and disrespectful to the current Acting Surgeon General. Here are the series of comments:

James Pace

Yesterday 3:35 PM 

You realize that the Surgeon General is a military position, right? Have you ever seen a ship without a Commanding Officer? There is a Surgeon General, just not one confirmed by the Senate. In any military position there will always be someone filling it. Here is your Acting Surgeon General, how about we give credit where credit is due, Rear Admiral (RADM) Boris D. Lushniak, M.D., M.P.H. He has earned the position due to his unwavering sense of duty and commitment to the Constitution of the United States. Not rooting for President Obama on this one, just my fellow brother in arms.

Show less

Tony S.O.

Yesterday 4:00 PM

The position of Surgeon General has been vacant since July 2013. You do realize that no active duty military commander's position has been ever left vacant for a year and a half. That's just plain dereliction on the part of politicians particularly the POTUS and Congress. I'm certain the interim is a fine man, but that's not the point of this post. The fact remains that bipartisan interests and a stubborn refusal to act in the best interests of the US rather than political arm wrestling has resulted in what is an embarrassing stalemate.

Show less

James Pace

Yesterday 4:24 PM 

It is not Vacant though, the position is filled. Every Naval Ship in the U.S. Navy has a CO, it always is filled because if not you can't run a ship. Every CO must be sanctioned by Congress to be filled, if there was ever anytime where that is not the case due to a firing of a CO someone will always be there to fill the spot until Congress puts someone else in. The Surgeon General is no different, he is the CO of the Commission Health Corps. Trust me Tony, I highly dislike President Obama as much as you do, but this doesn't prove anyone that he is an evil man, all it says is that since RADM Lushniak is doing such a fine job, it is not a priority to find someone to replace him at this point. You mislead people by saying there isn't a Surgeon General when there is an amazing one in office right now

Show less

Tony S.O.

Yesterday 5:36 PM 

+James Pace I'm not misleading anyone. I served six years in a boomer so you're preaching to the choir. Never in the annals of military history has a command been left neglected and unfilled for longer than a very short period in which the chain of command is utilized. This position has not been permanantly filled for almost a year and a half. You are actually misleading people with your apple and orange analogy of active duty military officers compared to a politically appointed post that happens to bear a military rank. To say there's "no difference" is ludicrous. Again, whether the interim is doing well or not is moot. And yet again, it's not the essence of this post.

Show less

James Pace

Yesterday 6:29 PM

I think I have said enough that people will make their own conclusions. My personal opinion, I think many of my brothers and sisters in arms, like your self, are fighting the wrong fight. There is a greater enemy than some petty politicians. Guess what when that enemy launches its attack to destroy the Constitution, we won't be prepared because we were to worried about a position being filled or not

Show less

Tony S.O.

Yesterday 6:36 PM 

+James Pace Thats pure bullshit. I would like to think most patriots can multitask. The "petty politicians" are the reason the US is in dire straits today. Try to think past the unfilled position to the deeper underlying problem. The lack of cohesion and the avarice that exists in our country's leadership has been and continues to be the single most detrimental facet to a united people.

Show less

James Pace

Yesterday 6:47 PM

You can go ahead and play patriot and listen to Rush Limbaugh and watch Fox News, or if you are on the other side, watch Andy Cooper and CNN. I will keep watch and defend and support the Constitution against the enemy that was warned by Presidents Thomas Jefferson, Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy.

Show less

Tony S.O.

Yesterday 8:02 PM

+James Pace I was wondering how long it would be before you became personal in this discussion. It's a sign of cognitive deficiency and immaturity you know. Don't feel bad. Most liberals resort to footstomping when they are in above their heads. I will retort. You are presumptuous to even pretend to know my political inclinations. What is it that you do so gallantly to "support the Constitution" other than say you do. Actually as I see you, your nothing more than a poor, frustrated liberal defending the undefendable. Carry on little man.

Show less

James Pace

Yesterday 8:28 PM

Just goes to show how much you would know my brother. Nearly 10 years of honoring my oath to support and defend the Constitution and continue to do so. I plan to mentor and train others what that means. Trust me my brother it has nothing to do with politics. The Constitution is beyond that. It is under attack by a far greater enemy than what you are fighting, and the only ones that will be able to defend it are those that have taken the oath to defend it and understand what that means, and what it will take.

Show less

Tony S.O.

4:14 AM

+James Pace Since you've mentioned it at least 15 times, I have six years active duty DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION and 20+ years as a street cop where we are sworn to DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION. Know your audience pal.

Show less

James Pace

9:05 AM

I know my audience, all I see is a hick that things defending the Constitution means bashing people over the internet and posting unfounded propaganda. I don't even want to imagine how you were as a cop. I know plenty of good cops that believe in upholding the Constitution, but I have met just as many that don't even know what that means, they go and abuse their power violating peoples Constitutional rights, arresting without cause, search and seizure without a warren or probable cause. I don't think you would know the first thing it means to uphold the Constitution of the United States, as a matter in fact you will probably ban me from the group or something like that and violating my First Amendment Right.

Show less

Tony S.O.

9:32 AM

NYC is a hick town? You know what, you began this little tirade. As I said before, you're a presumptuous small minded liberal who believes he's a hero and touts his great constitutional prowess. Learn up son. Not everyone wraps themselves in the flag and expects accolades. Your First Ammendment rights...lmfao. They don't apply to privately run social communities you fool. Read a book man!

Show less

James Pace

10:04 AM

you heard it from +Tony S.O. he is above the supreme law of the land, said like a true NYC Police Officer. This is to the rest of you, if you believe I am a liberal, you will reconsider if you read my blog and see what I am doing to preserve the Constitution visitidfreedomblog.blogspot.com

This is my cause, this should be your cause. This is the type of training our young new generation of law enforcement officers, military members are getting. They don't have the first clue of what it means to defend your Constitutional Rights. If this doesn't inspire you to help me support the cause of IDF then I am not sure what will.