Showing posts with label oath keeper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oath keeper. Show all posts

Thursday, December 4, 2014

In Eric's Honor

I recently wrote a two part post on racism and in my own way charging our tyrannic world government with inciting a form of discrimination to create violence and chaos. So that is where I stand on racism in America.

I decided give my two cents on the matter of Eric Garner's tragic death. Mainly on the grand jury's decision to not indict the police officer accused of killing Gardner by putting him in a chokehold.

I wanted to read some articles from several sources on the issue to make sure I know what the hell I am talking about. I noticed something on a CNN article that cought my eye. You can see on screen shot to the right where I highlighted CNN instigating the racial issue. This doesn't mean I have discounted the accusation of there being a racial issue, I am just stating that CNN really wanted to make sure you knew it was a black man and a white officer incident. Normally when you hear any other incident between a black officer and white man or any race between any different race, it is never mentioned in the article the races involve. Example below.
This story doesn't get nearly as much air time as Michael Brown incident or Eric Garner incident. This was an incident between an Asian police officer and a Black man. Not as big of news. Because why would a minority racially profile another?


Now what happened to Eric Gardner was tragic, and you have all seen the video of what happened and you can come to your own conclusion if it was murder or not. A point I would like to raise is, it is not like the justice system is broken. The tyrannic master is trying to make you think it is. Convincing you to turn over your Constitutional Rights over for his "fixed justice system". What I am talking about is, the Jury of our piers have decided that the Police Officer in question did not commit a crime. It was people like you and me, free Americans that made that decision, the rest of us may think it was unfair, but unfortunately we weren't there to make that decision. That doesn't mean that the justice system is broken and that we need to change it. If we ask our government to change the Bill of Rights, and that is exactly what they want you to do, then they will have their authority to throw away all of your Constitutional Rights.

All I am saying is be careful for what you ask for. Ask for your Constitutional Rights to be upheld by those that swore an oath to do so. Talk to your local law enforcement agencies, talk to your district attorneys, tell them that we want them to defend our Constitutional Rights. 

Lets demand for our Constitutional Rights in his memory.
Rest in peace Eric




Thursday, November 13, 2014

There is hope

Today I saw a glimpse of hope. As I was waiting in the chow line for breakfast, one of the food service members asked the girl in front of me to take off her backpack while she is in the chow line due to the rules posted in the mess. The girl with the backpack looked at her and said "pssss, what ever" and ignored her. The food service girl didn't do anything because she didn't want confrontation. Being a rank above the girl with the backpack I decided to say something. All I said was this, "does it really hurt to be nice, she was nice to you and she was only doing her job, that is what is wrong with this world, we don't know how to be nice to each other." The face on her was of such shame that it impressed me, and she took off her backpack.



If we can all influence people to just be brothers and sisters and take care of one another, look out for each other and be respectful we might have a chance against the tyrants. We should be ashamed of how we treat one another, it is pathetic, sad, disturbing. Those guys last night, so called oath keepers, I know they felt shame, specially after one of them told me that they wouldn't trust me with their back, my answer to them was I would watch out for their back anyways, because he was a brother in arms. He didn't expect that, he partially took back what he said. He felt shame. This brings me hope.

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

LMAO

I went to go check my mail this morning at the post office and it was close. Now, the last time I checked today is Veteran's Day. Unless I missed something on my federal calendar I didn't see where it mentioned Postal Service Day.



As usual, these things got me thinking. Of course I realize that it is a federal holiday and that there are veterans working in places like the Postal Service. Now I still believe that those that aren't veterans in federal agencies should still go to work, that is a personal opinion of mine. Anyways, here is where I get thinking. The government saves money some money when there is a holiday, right? You would think that when there is nothing going on during that day that the government would save money in not spending energy during that day or not using supplies that day. The answer is no, they still spend the same.

So let me recap this. We allow everyone in the federal government to take a day off regardless if they are veterans or not. No money is saved, no money goes towards veterans in need and everyone sits at home watching football and drinking beer. Sounds great to me (if I were talking to you, you would hear sarcasm in my voice).

I am not sure what is the purpose of having the post office close during Veteran's day. All I know is that while everyone enjoys a holiday that is meant for those that have made significant sacrifices to protect a piece of document, barbecuing, drinking, and making bunch of dough from sales, we have over 50,000 veterans homeless and unemployed, sick and in need of medical attention. Don't you just love the American dream.

Monday, November 3, 2014

Saddest Post

So there has been many of you that have been nothing but supportive and helping get word out, and I am nothing but appreciative for your kind gestures. Unfortunately in the world we live in we can't do much without resources or funds. I have been working on Inception of Defending Freedom for little over a month and it doesn't seem like it is getting any traction. I feel that IDF could be a major turning point in our country, to really get good people in our armed forces, law enforcement and local civil offices to defend our Constitution that poses constant threat to be destroyed. IDF would also be a beacon of hope for those that have already sacrificed enough to know they are still needed, wanted and cared about.

I personally am losing hope, if I can't get this project moving by Christmas I will have no choice but to pull the plug on the whole thing. My hope is that we can pull through, but if we can't, I hope that other organizations can take my strategy and run with it, because it is one I believe can work, it just needs fuel.

I am hoping for the best.

Thursday, October 23, 2014

Thugish

I know I said I would write a blog based off of my last post but I didn't get the participation I anticipated. Thank you so much for my good pals that did participate, thank you so much, I am always happy that I have your support.

Today's blog is on a realization that I have made today as I was waiting in line at the mess decks, or as my brothers and sisters from other branches call it "chow hall". This new generation have been surrendered. They have been surrendered to MTV, BET, VH1, TruTV, Son's of Anarchy and Walking Dead. The previous outlets mentioned are the nannies of the enemy.

As I waited in line for chow a few of my little brothers in arms decided that it would be ok to just cut in line. When I asked why, they were surprised that I asked, like I was from another planet. They just couldn't understand how I didn't understand why it is ok for them to cut. So I told them, "look, I am just going to go ahead and cut back in front of you and if the people behind me want to keep their mouth shut they can, I am not waiting behind you when I was here first". Once I sat down to enjoy the Navy's world famous lasagna, I over heard some of my little brothers talking, and they were talking like what people from my generation and prior would call "common thugs". They were having a legitimate conversation, don't get me wrong, but the manner was thugish. I just couldn't process.

It is no wonder how it is easy to get this new bread of service men and women to pretty much do anything you order them to do even if it is illegal, all you have to do is publicize it in that manner and they will follow.

BUT WAIT!!!!

I have a solution. Mentorship, and I can prove to you it works, I have a handful of service men and women that I have mentored and I can tell  you they are the top professionals you can expect to support and defend the Constitution, one of them has been such a great apprentice that I am proud to say he has surpassed me in rank, and I am ok with that because I know he will lead in the manner I trained him.

If I can get IDF off the ground I can hook up many of these miss guided sailors, marines, airmen and soldiers to a true Oath Keeper, and together we can get our defenses back for our Constitution. I hope you join me.

Monday, October 20, 2014

Interactive

Today's post is going to be a bit different and I hope to get your participation. I want to pose the question and you choose which answer best fits you.

Are the military air strikes in Syria and Iraq lawful?

a. Yes, the Commander-in-Chief has the power to order an attack at any time any where
b. No, but since its to fight terrorism it is ok
c. Yes, because it is sanctioned by the UN
d. No, per the Constitution only Congress of the United States can "... declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;"

Go ahead and answer in the comment area below, after I tally up the answers tomorrow I will base my next post base off the results.

Saturday, October 18, 2014

J Steven Davis

As promised, I wanted to to share with you the remarkable story of Steve Davis and what journey. As I had mentioned, I met Steve at an Oath Keepers meeting in San Diego where he was a guest speaker. Steve has lived a very interesting life. Escaping death in multiple occasions, nothing prepared him for the government he served under to turn on him.

Let me begin with bringing to light Steve's amazing career, from beginning to present.
  • U.S. Air Force as an Aircraft Records Tech, Legal USAF/CAP Service Specialist, Claims Investigator, Staff Judge Advocate, JAG, Aviation SAR/CN, Command Pilot
  • La Verne Police Dept. Police Officer, Use of Force Instructor
  • Parker Hannifin Corporation as Deputy Director of Contracts and Contract Administrator
  • James S. Davis and Associates as Civil Trial Attorney and Corporate Counsel
  • California Private Attorney General Group, APC as a Chief Counsel and Class Action Plaintiff Attorney Wage and Overtime Cases
  • Central Intelligence Agency Contracted Field Agent - Classified
  • San Bernardino Sheriff Dept. as Specialized Detectives Bomb-Arson; Major Fraud Investigations; Aviation SAR/CN, LEO Transport
  • Arroyo Grande Fire Department Administrative Battalion Chief; Fire Investigation Unit; California Cert. Peace Officer
  • Barstow Fire Protection Administrative District (Retired) as Deputy Chief, Assistant Fire Marshal, and California Cert. Peace Officer
  • Litigation Logistics Group, Inc as Chief Operations Officer, Expert Witness and Legal Researcher
So as you can see, Steve lives to serve the people and uphold the Constitution. So why did the US Government go after Steve? Here is his story as told by him.

"I am a Certified Class Action Plaintiff Wage Attorney. I have sued and won over ten multi-million dollar cases against such companies such as TJ Maxx, Ross Dress for Less, Ritz Camera and others. After a television interview I did I was contacted by the United States Postal Inspector who asked me to investigate the U.S. Postal Service for not paying overtime.
I determined that he had a case so I filed a Class Action Case for the Postal Inspectors. The Defense Counsel was the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles. No sooner had I filed that case then the same office charged me with Tax Evasion and illegal carrying a duty weapon. They cannot not do both because of the Conflict of Interest, that is prosecuting opposing Counsel. The Federal Public Defender did not conduct a defense and although I later proved I was innocent, I am still fighting that case. The Government refuses to give me the proof they control on my actual innocence. So I remain a "convicted felon" and lost 5 years of my life as a "guest" of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. My new Attorney has tried to discuss this Brady v. Maryland violation with the U.S. Attorney but they refuse to discuss it. My cases in the Central District of California are 04-CR-0770 and 04-CR-0771. The Assistant U.S. Attorney on the case is Ruth Pinkel."

Steve told me his story after I went to him for research on the claims of the Government's Income Tax being unconstitutional, of which was for my post "Constitution (Part 2)"

I can't stress my brothers and sister in arms enough that we sworn an oath to defend and support the Constitution. What will it take? What would we do if our own government attacked the Constitution? These are questions that are important now. This is what we need to prepare for.


Comical

I had an interesting exchange of comments on a Google+ post which I found completely pointless. The post was on the US Military Community which is owned by Tony S.O. (A.K.A. Sargent Tony Hardass?) and the post was from him. Here is a screenshot

 So he claims that under President Obama there hasn't been a Surgeon General. Misleading the members of the community in order to discredit President Obama. Now keep in mind, I don't give two shits about President Obama, he is my Commander-in-Chief. But how many times have I mentioned my loyalty is not to him but to the Constitution of the United States?

I was compelled to correct the discrepancy because I felt that this post was misleading and disrespectful to the current Acting Surgeon General. Here are the series of comments:


James Pace
Yesterday 3:35 PM 
You realize that the Surgeon General is a military position, right? Have you ever seen a ship without a Commanding Officer? There is a Surgeon General, just not one confirmed by the Senate. In any military position there will always be someone filling it. Here is your Acting Surgeon General, how about we give credit where credit is due, Rear Admiral (RADM) Boris D. Lushniak, M.D., M.P.H. He has earned the position due to his unwavering sense of duty and commitment to the Constitution of the United States. Not rooting for President Obama on this one, just my fellow brother in arms.
Show less

Tony S.O.
Yesterday 4:00 PM
The position of Surgeon General has been vacant since July 2013. You do realize that no active duty military commander's position has been ever left vacant for a year and a half. That's just plain dereliction on the part of politicians particularly the POTUS and Congress. I'm certain the interim is a fine man, but that's not the point of this post. The fact remains that bipartisan interests and a stubborn refusal to act in the best interests of the US rather than political arm wrestling has resulted in what is an embarrassing stalemate.
Show less

James Pace
Yesterday 4:24 PM 
It is not Vacant though, the position is filled. Every Naval Ship in the U.S. Navy has a CO, it always is filled because if not you can't run a ship. Every CO must be sanctioned by Congress to be filled, if there was ever anytime where that is not the case due to a firing of a CO someone will always be there to fill the spot until Congress puts someone else in. The Surgeon General is no different, he is the CO of the Commission Health Corps. Trust me Tony, I highly dislike President Obama as much as you do, but this doesn't prove anyone that he is an evil man, all it says is that since RADM Lushniak is doing such a fine job, it is not a priority to find someone to replace him at this point. You mislead people by saying there isn't a Surgeon General when there is an amazing one in office right now
Show less

Tony S.O.
Yesterday 5:36 PM 
+James Pace I'm not misleading anyone. I served six years in a boomer so you're preaching to the choir. Never in the annals of military history has a command been left neglected and unfilled for longer than a very short period in which the chain of command is utilized. This position has not been permanantly filled for almost a year and a half. You are actually misleading people with your apple and orange analogy of active duty military officers compared to a politically appointed post that happens to bear a military rank. To say there's "no difference" is ludicrous. Again, whether the interim is doing well or not is moot. And yet again, it's not the essence of this post.
Show less

James Pace
Yesterday 6:29 PM
I think I have said enough that people will make their own conclusions. My personal opinion, I think many of my brothers and sisters in arms, like your self, are fighting the wrong fight. There is a greater enemy than some petty politicians. Guess what when that enemy launches its attack to destroy the Constitution, we won't be prepared because we were to worried about a position being filled or not
Show less

Tony S.O.
Yesterday 6:36 PM 
+James Pace Thats pure bullshit. I would like to think most patriots can multitask. The "petty politicians" are the reason the US is in dire straits today. Try to think past the unfilled position to the deeper underlying problem. The lack of cohesion and the avarice that exists in our country's leadership has been and continues to be the single most detrimental facet to a united people.
Show less

James Pace
Yesterday 6:47 PM
You can go ahead and play patriot and listen to Rush Limbaugh and watch Fox News, or if you are on the other side, watch Andy Cooper and CNN. I will keep watch and defend and support the Constitution against the enemy that was warned by Presidents Thomas Jefferson, Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy.
Show less

Tony S.O.
Yesterday 8:02 PM
+James Pace I was wondering how long it would be before you became personal in this discussion. It's a sign of cognitive deficiency and immaturity you know. Don't feel bad. Most liberals resort to footstomping when they are in above their heads. I will retort. You are presumptuous to even pretend to know my political inclinations. What is it that you do so gallantly to "support the Constitution" other than say you do. Actually as I see you, your nothing more than a poor, frustrated liberal defending the undefendable. Carry on little man.
Show less

James Pace
Yesterday 8:28 PM
Just goes to show how much you would know my brother. Nearly 10 years of honoring my oath to support and defend the Constitution and continue to do so. I plan to mentor and train others what that means. Trust me my brother it has nothing to do with politics. The Constitution is beyond that. It is under attack by a far greater enemy than what you are fighting, and the only ones that will be able to defend it are those that have taken the oath to defend it and understand what that means, and what it will take.
Show less

Tony S.O.
4:14 AM
+James Pace Since you've mentioned it at least 15 times, I have six years active duty DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION and 20+ years as a street cop where we are sworn to DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION. Know your audience pal.
Show less

James Pace
9:05 AM
I know my audience, all I see is a hick that things defending the Constitution means bashing people over the internet and posting unfounded propaganda. I don't even want to imagine how you were as a cop. I know plenty of good cops that believe in upholding the Constitution, but I have met just as many that don't even know what that means, they go and abuse their power violating peoples Constitutional rights, arresting without cause, search and seizure without a warren or probable cause. I don't think you would know the first thing it means to uphold the Constitution of the United States, as a matter in fact you will probably ban me from the group or something like that and violating my First Amendment Right.
Show less

Tony S.O.
9:32 AM
NYC is a hick town? You know what, you began this little tirade. As I said before, you're a presumptuous small minded liberal who believes he's a hero and touts his great constitutional prowess. Learn up son. Not everyone wraps themselves in the flag and expects accolades. Your First Ammendment rights...lmfao. They don't apply to privately run social communities you fool. Read a book man!
Show less

James Pace
10:04 AM
you heard it from +Tony S.O. he is above the supreme law of the land, said like a true NYC Police Officer. This is to the rest of you, if you believe I am a liberal, you will reconsider if you read my blog and see what I am doing to preserve the Constitution visitidfreedomblog.blogspot.com

This is my cause, this should be your cause. This is the type of training our young new generation of law enforcement officers, military members are getting. They don't have the first clue of what it means to defend your Constitutional Rights. If this doesn't inspire you to help me support the cause of IDF then I am not sure what will.


Thursday, October 16, 2014

Constitution (Part 2)

As I mentioned in Part 1, I have been doing some reading and research into the Constitution and the government's unlawful acts. One of the topics I ran into was the Income Tax. I have read from many conspirators that the Income Tax is unconstitutional and how there are no laws allowing the government to tax income or no laws forcing citizens to pay income taxes to the government.

I decided to look further into it. I contacted a gentlemen that I have met at an Oath Keepers meeting. He specializes in investigating conspiracy theories involving the constitution. His name is Steve Davis and boy has he lived an extroardinary life. As a matter in fact I am working on a blog just about his life story that I am sure you will enjoy. In the mean time I will tell you what I have learned from him in regards of the income tax conspiracy.

I emailed him asking the following questions:

  1. Is the Federal Income Tax Constitutional or not?
  2. If is or not, how would I know?
His response was the following:

The basis of this "conspiracy" is that the 16th amendment was passed in two different sessions of congress. There is nothing in the Constitution that says this cannot be done. It has been raised as a defense in tax cases including one in the 9th circuit and was denied. What I think is illegal in the IRS has passed regulations that are in excess of their authority and they are now using their authority as a political weapon. That is very illegal, but the U.S. Attorney is helping them.

Steve as a matter in fact has been a victim of the IRS and its abuse of power. Steve is a retired Air Force Officer and has been in investigator, police officer, lawyer, even a pilot. So why did the IRS go after Steve?

Steve at the time was serving as Certified Class Action Plaintiff Wage Attorney, who has won plenty of high profile cases. One case would change his life forever. After a television interview a United States Postal Inspector contacted Steve and asked him to investigate the U.S. Postal Service for not paying overtime. He determined that he had a really good case and filed for a class action lawsuit. Not to long after the Postal Service pressed charges on Steve for tax evasion and illegal carry of a duty weapon. He still continues to fight this case and the IRS refuses to show the proof they apparently have. Because of the continues battle, Steve is labeled as a "convicted felon" without a fair trial.

For my blog on Steve I will explain more on his case. But, from what I have told you already you can see that the government will go to great lengths to protect themselves instead of doing what is called for them to do by the Constitution and that is to defend it's citizens. 

So is the income tax unconstitutional, from everything I have read, and from what I have learned from Steve, I have determined it is not. However, does that make your government constitutional? I think I have explained enough in this blog for your to make your own determination.

Stay tuned for my blog on Steve Davis and his amazing story.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

The Constitution (Part I)

Most of my readers are probably veterans, anti-globalists, and of course constitutionalists. Or so most of them say they are. I've been doing a lot of research lately into the Constitution. I also been looking into legislation passed by congress,  policies made by the executive branch, and all the other bulls**t that comes out of Washington lately. Then something dawn to me.

Art I Sec 4
"The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall by Law appoint a different Day."


Art I Sec 6
"The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place."

Art I Sec 7
"All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills."

Oh and my favorite Section of Article I of the Constitution, the whole section:
Art I Sec 8
"The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
"

Are any of these sections being upheld by our government? There are many more that are not being followed but these are the ones I am touching on right now. And keep in mind that out of all of the ones mentioned only one had an amendment, it changed the day Congress meets from 1st Monday of December to the 3rd day of January.

So has anything the Government have been doing Constitutional?(Rhetorical question) Yet we allow them to do it. We fought the British for violating our basic human rights, for imposing unfair and illegal taxes, for stealing, for no representation, for abuse of military power imposed on civilians, the list goes on. Yet the United States Federal Government is doing it to you and you shrug your shoulders. They purposely violate the supreme law of the land and you stand by as it is nothing.

My last blog I quoted Thomas Jefferson, "Every citizen should be a soldier... ." Here is the most important part of the Constitution in my opinion:

Bill of Rights, 10th Amendment
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Through out history there has been many in government that have mocked, ignored, snubbed at this article, yet it is the most important, it is the article that prohibits the Government from oversteping its bounds set by the Constitution. It puts the power in the hands of the American Citizen.

Here is one other article I want you to put thought into:
Bill of Rights, 2nd Amendment
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

Brothers and Sister in Arms, Brothers and Sisters in Law Enforcement, local Public Servants, you are the security of the free States, along with every other citizen of the United States of America. The difference between you and a civilian is that you made an oath to uphold the constitution, to defend and support it.




Monday, October 13, 2014

Politics

President Thomas Jefferson once said "Every citizen should be a soldier. This was the case with the Greeks and Romans, and must be that of every free state." Today I see to many of my brothers and sisters in arms playing politician instead of doing what they sworn to do.

Politics is no place for a soldier. We must not play such trivial game. Our game is the game of strategy, honor, courage, commitment and fidelity. Our commitment and loyalty is to the Constitution. So I beg you my brothers and sisters, stop this nonsense of playing politics. Stop choosing a side with congressmen and women who say nothing but lies to get themselves into office so they can be among the privileged.

Stop with the conservative vs. liberal scuffles. It is trivial, prepare yourself, there is an actual war coming and it is right outside your door. The politicians are not going to save you. Your brothers and sisters in arms will. There is a whole new generation of service men and women that can help us. They just need our help to guide them to the right direction. That is what Inception of Defending Freedom is all about, it begins at our oath. Leave the politics to the politicians. We are soldiers, sailors, airmen, coast guardsmen and marines. As I quoted from the great President, every citizen should be a soldier, we are going to need every one of them.

Follow no one man or woman, we have something better than that. We have a supreme document that trumps any man. We have the Constitution. As long as the orders pass down to you are constitutional then follow them to your best capabilities, if someone tries to defile the Constitution, defend it with your life, if someone even thinks about violating any of the basic human rights inherited to every American, defend them.

Join me.

Saturday, October 11, 2014

I'm pissed off

Here is the reason why I am pissed off. I am doing more research on the demographics and statistics of homeless and/or unemployed veterans. This paragraph hurts:

"The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) states that the nation’s homeless veterans are predominantly male, with roughly 8% being female. The majority are single; live in urban areas; and suffer from mental illness, alcohol and/or substance abuse, or co-occurring disorders. About 12% of the adult homeless population are veterans." from NCHV.ORG

It hurts because I can see me ending up in this statistic and most of all it hurts to see my brothers and sisters that are in this statistic. What is more disturbing about that paragraph is that it is reported by the VA. If the f***ing VA knows about it, why aren't they doing anything about it.

 This is the reported budget from the VA.

59,067,000,000 for medicare? Yet 12% of homeless are Veterans ("There are 610,042 people experiencing homelessness on any given night in the United States", ref. http://www.endhomelessness.org), majority due to lack of mental health care. This f***ing sick. I personally suffer from mental health issues and when I get out this is what I am looking forward to.

Look, I get it, the government the military is managed by is corrupt and is constantly violating the Constitution, and many service members don't realize that some of the orders given to them violates the Constitution, but that is what IDF is about, we are committed to put in the effort to bring awareness to the new generation of heroes. Don't punish the my brothers and sisters in arms, they made an oath to uphold the Constitution and they did the best they could. When they took the oath they really believed in it.

Here are the kind of things I can see IDF doing for my brothers and sisters, and it is just the least we would do, imagine with your support how much more we can do.




There are a number of ways you can support IDF:





Thursday, October 9, 2014

Training Time!

So someone I admire very much posted a very interesting documentary titled "America Freedom to Fascism" by Aaron Russo on Google Plus. Now, I am not much one to discuss taxation laws, federal reserve or definition of income, all though I believe it is all very unconstitutional.

What caught my eye on the documentary is the section on what happened in New Orleans during Katrina. I was disturbed by the fact that an officer of the National Guard in the video knew and expressed that what they were doing was wrong yet he followed his orders anyways. So if you know that the order is unlawful why in the hell would you follow them. I trimmed the video to that portion of the documentary so you can see for yourself.


Again, don't follow unlawful orders if you know they are unlawful, because you made an oath to support and defend the Constitution, that means not to infringe in citizens rights inherited by the Constitution in the Bill of Rights. It is your duty as a member of the United States Armed Forces to disobey, challenge and report all unlawful orders.

I want to know your thoughts, please comment below.

Tomorrow's blog will be something special, so please stay tuned.

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Oath Keeping

Another blog about oath keeping. Why? Because not a day goes by that I don't find a discrepancy in someone that has made sacred oath and not keep it.

Someone posted today this article which as usual I tried to find something that might show a brother or sister at arms trying to do the right thing. In this case I didn't find it.



So when you watch the video it seems to be an ordinary traffic stop, you could argue that the passenger may have been somewhat unreasonable, I tried to. I get where the officers drew their guns. Here is the problem, the breaking of the window, considering that their were children in the car, was unnecessary, the tazing also unnecessary. You know what, lets just say that it could be argued justifiable. Then the statement came from the Hammond Police Department.

So, I did the research and couldn't find anything in Indiana's Code of Justice, revisions, legislations, bills, nothing stating that Law Enforcement officers can without probable cause search and seize an individual nor arrest without probable cause. As a matter in fact there were detailed laws in favor of Jamal Jones to refuse showing his ID. Now if there are municipal laws that states that law enforcement officers can demand ID of anyone in the vehicle during a traffic stop then you have to ask the important question that I ask every oath keeper to ask, is that law constitutional, is that order lawful. If the answer is no then don't do it. The only reason those law enforcement officers took that route is because they had power to do so and used it without regard of the individual's inherited rights by the supreme law of the land.

For those who are or have been in law enforcement I am sure you know the oath of honor.

"On my honor,
I will never betray my badge,
my integrity, my character,
or the public trust.

I will always have the courage
to hold myself and others
accountable for our actions.

I will always uphold the Constitution,
the community,
and the agency I serve,
so help me God."


So my request to the Hammond Police Department, keep your oath by upholding the Constitution, that means not upholding laws that are unconstitutional.